Uladzimir Ignatik vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Denolly has a better second serve performance, winning 44.32% of points, compared to Ignatik's 29.17%. Could this serve advantage be a game-changer?
• When it comes to returning, Ignatik outperforms Denolly by winning 69.7% of points on opponents' second serve, while Denolly stands at 47.43%.
• For first serve returns, Ignatik edges Denolly, achieving 31.82% success, slightly better than Denolly's 26.26%.
• Under pressure, Ignatik has saved 60% of breakpoints faced, surpassing Denolly's 51.81%, which suggests he handles stressful moments well.
• Overall, Ignatik has a higher annual match-winning rate at 80% (4/1) against Denolly's 57.81% (37/27), indicating a recent form advantage.
• Denolly's best surface is Clay with a 66% win rate, whereas Ignatik excels on Hard surfaces with a 58% win rate. Could surface preference influence this encounter?
• Denolly competes mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K level, winning 37.5%, while Ignatik dominates Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level with 80% success.
• Ignatik has faced better-ranked opponents (average rank 174) compared to Denolly (average rank 283.89), indicating exposure to tougher competition.
• In deciding sets, Denolly has a superior track record, winning 72% compared to Ignatik's 50% over the last year.
• When it comes to breakpoint conversion, Ignatik is slightly better, converting 36.36% of opportunities compared to Denolly's 31.68%.

Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent performance statistics, both players show strengths and weaknesses that could impact the forthcoming match. Denolly's second serve performance stands out as a significant strength against Ignatik, potentially tipping the scales in his favor during longer rallies.

Ignatik, however, possesses superior return stats, especially on opponents' second serves, suggesting he could thrive in breaking Denolly's game rhythm. His ability to handle pressure by saving breakpoints at a higher rate demonstrates resilience in critical points.

Though Denolly shows dominance in deciding sets, where he appears more resilient, Ignatik's higher overall winning percentage and exposure to higher-ranked opponents might give him a strategic edge.

Considering these factors, Ignatik is slightly favored to win the upcoming match owing to his robust return game and higher competitive exposure.